Understanding Your Options
Mediation vs. Arbitration
Two different processes. One common goal: resolution without court. Here's how to know which one fits your situation.
Mediation
Parties reach a mutual agreement
The mediator facilitates — they don't decide. Both parties retain full control over the outcome. Agreements are voluntary and shaped by both sides.
Both parties submit confidential briefs outlining their positions before the session begins.
Each side delivers an uninterrupted opening statement to the mediator.
Joint discussion and private caucuses allow each side to explore settlement options confidentially.
If agreement is reached, a binding Settlement Agreement is drafted and signed before the session ends.
Best for: Family matters, interpersonal disputes, contract negotiations, and any case where preserving the relationship matters.
Arbitration
A neutral arbitrator decides the outcome
Arbitration is a private, streamlined alternative to trial. Both parties present evidence and arguments to a neutral arbitrator — who issues a final, binding decision.
One party files a Demand for Arbitration. The other responds. Both parties agree on a neutral arbitrator.
A preliminary hearing establishes the schedule, discovery scope, and pre-hearing briefs.
An evidentiary hearing is conducted — opening statements, witness examination, and documentary evidence.
The arbitrator issues a formal, binding Award — typically within 30 days of the hearing.
Best for: Cases with clear legal or factual disputes where a definitive ruling is needed and both parties consent to the process.